If you look at my post of June 10, you’ll see that it elicited a strong response from Sergeant Ritchie. I am still a bit perplexed by this, as I do not believe that post was extremely critical of FWPD. All I did was to sort through the raw data and analyze how my neighborhood compares to the rest of the city. The results are more of a testament to the nature of my neighbors rather than of the behavior of the police. By my calculations it appears that, during the one year time period that I studied, there was about nine times as much reported police activity in my neighborhood as compared to the average Fort Wayne neighborhood.
Granted, that is not exactly the way I stated it though. What I actually said was that there was more crime (rather than just reported police activity) in my neighborhood. And to Sergeant Ritchie, it appears that my “misrepresenting” the facts was seen as a purposeful action on my part, intended to slander the hard work that FWPD is doing in my neighborhood. The only response I can make to that is that, logically, one would think these two activities (crime and police activity) would be very strongly correlated.
The very next day, I posted the other half of this story, which was to show that my neighborhood has settled down quite a bit in the past year. I do see that as a testament to the hard work of FWPD, and I thought I had indicated this on a previous post, but there too, Sergeant Ritchie took issue. In fact, this particular post is what my direct communications with Sergeant Ritchie had been moving me towards for quite some time.
Eventually, I will bring this blog to an end. But not before my goals have either been met or until I have pushed them to the point where I am forced to admit that they can’t be met, and not without giving some closing explanation. The dialoge which had existed between Sergeant Ritchie was actually compelling me to consider to stand down. I was getting very close to making a final statement saying something to the effect of “Although problems still exist, the dramatically improved situation now is even better than I hoped for when I first started this blog.”
And then, Chief Dumbfuck had to open his big mouth. There is certainly much cause for FWPD to receive recognition for the work they have been doing lately. I see the results not just here but in other areas of town where there is a lot of criminal activity. And I believe the police deserve a lot of credit for this. But to claim that the problem no longer exists, as Chief York’s idiotic statement did. Or to even imply that the problem never did exist, as some officers seem to do, is something that I find to be entirely unacceptable.
To understand why this bothers me so much, you only have to read a single newspaper story. A man walks past the corner of Suttenfield and Caroline (one block from my house), encounters a large group of people standing around, is offered and declines to buy drugs from them, gets told “Then get your punk ass off the block”, then is shot and nearly killed. And why did this happen? Only because he wandered into gangland, and offended one of the gang members. This single story epitomizes the conditions under which my neighborhood suffers much of the time, and it should make it clear that Chief York’s comments are patently false.
This is the way things have been for the entire time I have lived here. Granted, it has it’s quiet moments, but there is no better way to describe my neighborhood than to say that it is gang-controlled. Personally, this used to intimidate me quite a bit. There was a time when I was reluctant to wander on foot more than a couple houses away from my own, for fear that I would be seen as interfering with someone’s turf. But that wall came down the night they fire-bombed my house. It’s not that I now feel any safer it the neighborhood at large, it’s just that the illusion that remaining close to home would somehow protect me came to an end.
I’ve learned to take care of myself in this neighborhood. I walk to the store several blocks away and don’t worry when I pass by a group of drug dealers. This is because I am alert, and I am prepared for action (meaning that I am armed). But can you blame some of my older neighbors for not acting as nonchalant as I do? When they see these guys on the streets in front of their homes, selling drugs, often standing in large menacing looking groups, and on many occasions shooting at each other or setting people’s houses on fire. I think this alone would be enough to cause great concern for most people.
Then, when these old folks look out their windows and see the police at various times either ignoring these guys or palling around with them, it becomes alarming. And to further compound the problem, many of the police officers fail to properly differentiate between the criminals and the law abiding citizens here. The police sometime hold no reservations against meting out their aggressive tactics towards that same old lady who only the day before saw that officer standing on the corner, laughing and joking with the very same drug dealers who only the day before that were shooting at each other right beside her house.
So, the old lady gets stopped for driving through the alley on the way to her house, while the drug dealers often seem to get a free pass. What would you think? Although I have clearly stated that I no longer believe this is the case, and that is only because I have studied the situation intensely for the past three years, the observations that are gleaned from my neighborhood could easily lead one to speculate that the police are either afraid of these gangs, or are themselves actually the ones running the drugs here. And that is why Chief York’s idiotic comments are so insulting. We have a very serious gang problem in Fort Wayne, and the police department is a part of that problem.
But Sergeant Ritchie misconstrued my comments entirely. All I was doing in that post was pointing to the fact that crime is still very high in my neighborhood, while at the same time being sure to acknowledge the police for their role in greatly reducing it lately. Yet Sergeant Ritchie seemed to view this a s a baseless assault upon him and his officers. My response to Sergeant Ritchie on the blog tried to make a couple things clear. First of all, I blame the drug dealers, not the police, for instigating the problems here. And second, although I do take much issue with the improper way FWPD has dealt with the problem at times, I was clearly directing my current assault only at the top, to those people who would make such thoughtless statements as to claim that Fort Wayne does not have a gang problem.
So, I patiently awaited Sergeant Ritchie’s reply to this. I waited two weeks, and he made no reply. But my response was pretty harsh, so I decided to add another filler post to keep the blog active, while I continued waiting to allow him a fair chance to reply. Then, after waiting for two more weeks, I sent him a private e-mail. I just wanted to check and see if the channels of communication were still open, or if perhaps there was a reasonable explanation for a lack of response.
Sergeant Ritchie quickly responded to that e-mail, beginning with an explanation which in itself would have served to fully justify his apparent disconnect from the dialogue we had engaged in. But then, he went on to reply to something else I had said in my last e-mail, and that is what seemed to have finally pushed him over the edge. In that e-mail, I did nothing more than to try to make Sergeant Ritchie aware of a very serious problem in this neighborhood. This problem is one that his department is intimately connected to, and in fact has helped to create (although probably inadvertently.)
I told Sergeant Ritchie that I realized (for legal reasons) that he could probably not acknowledge that what I was saying actually was true, but I simply requested that he pass the information along to the appropriate persons within his department before the problem progressed further. I think I was doing the responsible thing by trying to communicate this information in private, but Sergeant Ritchie’s response made it clear that any comments which even slightly criticized his department would not be listened to by him.
Fair enough. I don’t have any right to demand that sergeant Ritchie listen to or talk with me. He wasn’t getting paid for the time he devoted to our dialogue, and he felt that it was no longer productive, so he was certainly within his rights to discontinue it. But the problem is, the department as a whole has already shown that they do not engage in real dialogue with citizens. Sure, they make public statements, but this is a one way dialogue, and it is often very far from honest.
So, per the actions of Sergeant Ritchie and of the people who run FWPD, I really have no choice now than to begin a full public assault against what I consider to be the real reason for the violent gang problems we are experiencing in Fort Wayne, which is ineffective leadership at FWPD. In my next post, I will try to briefly summarize the most salient points of my cause, and state what my goals are. And then, let the battle begin!
Phil:
ReplyDeleteWhile I understand your POV, I (personally) feel that there is a LOT more at work here than meets the eye.
MY friendship w/ Sgt Ritchie is another story that has no bearing on this post, so I'll just recuse myself now from speaking on that.
I think the largest part of the blame (and I can only speak from what you've described to me, as well as what I see in MY neighborhood) can be directed to the black community itself, for NOT taking a stand to halt the violence and idiotic behavior by their OWN people.
That is the BIGGEST disconnect (from what I have seen). Prayer can only go SO FAR...I don't care WHO you are. You have to get that community motivated to DO SOMETHING.
To date, not much has been done.
City council does little if nothing as well, with Glynn Hines attending a HARAMBEE festival, when he should be addresssing (tougher) issues IN HIS community.
Ditto for Pape (the blind man), who can't see the forest for the trees, if he got beaned by a low-hanging branch.
I also blame the real estate market that ALLOWS all these rentals to propagate, driving DOWN home values across the baord, lending itself to create a ghetto.
Used to be a time when damn near ALL rentals went through SOME real estate agency, instead of ALL these deadbeat "landlords",only interested in that monthly payment (and never ask where the cash is coming from).
No background checks, no regulation, and no interest in the damn neighborhood...THAT'S what causes the situations we see.
I blame the city for allowing this part of town to go downhill at an ever-increasing rate, while over-developing damn near every other part of town.
We dont even have a damn BOOKSTORE down here, OR a hobby shop, or a REAL music store (or any real retail), but we SURE as hell have plenty of LIQUOR stores (and bars), don't we?
THAT alone should send up a dozen or so red flags!
I'm sure if you ask a lot of the LEOs that run our areas, they'd LOVE to be able to go door-to-door, confiscating illegal guns, serving warrants, citing code violations, busting the druggies, etc., but we have this damn thing called LAW.
It's the damn probable cause gig...keeps getting in the way.
Doesn't matter WHAT your gut tells you or how you just "know" those perps are dirty...you can't stormtroop your way down the block.
To allow such activities as I mentioned would bring the SWORD OF DAMOCLES down upon the FWPD's head, as well as the city itself, resulting in a string of lawsuits that would no doubt bankrupt this city faster than the Cash for Clunkers deal!
Now, I'm not sticking up for ALL the brass at the Dept...justcertain ones, as well as the boots on the streets doing the HARD jobs.
We see this evident every week...officers being called for doing their JOB. And they get sued.
Used to be people WELCOMED having the police in their area...today, this sub-culture within certain areas has nothing but disdain for law-enforcement, as these people operate with their OWN "set of laws", designed to negate (or at least limit) citizen involvement.
I KNOW I have an uphill climb on this one, as I see little evidence of real CHANGE...just new faces doing the same old shit.
For every one you bust, five more show up and keep the ball rolling.
There needs to be some ACCOUNTABILITY...NOW, and it might as well start at the CITY level...and eventually, it MIGHT drip on down to the CIVILIAN level...we can only hope.
(sorry to go on...I'm done now...LOL)
Stay safe.
Damn, Bob, get your own blog! - LOL
ReplyDeleteSeriously, I appreciate the comments and I agree with most of them.
As for the police, it is the brass who have made themselves my enemies. I believe that anyone who acts as they do is the enemy of all law-abiding citizens as well as all good police officers. The habits that they routinely engage in can, at best, be described as extreme dereliction of duty. I think they differentiate little between the criminals who cause the problems and the citizens who complain about it. Their job gets easier whenever either one of the two goes away, and I really think some of these people have so lost their focus that they no longer care which one it is. As long as things are quiet (from their perspective) they are satisfied.
The most unfortunate thing about this is that the brass are practically untouchable. I have gone through the appropriate channels to voice my concerns including internal affairs, board of public safety, even directly calling Chef York and FWPD spokesperson Michael Joyner, and there is still no communication. It is unfortunate, but (as cowards often do) the brass have insulated themselves so well from public pressure that it is their rank and file officers who must bear the brunt of the responsibility for their actions. The reason people end up shouting at officers on the street is very often because they know that is the only way they will be heard.
With my use of pseudonyms, my blog has been little more than a curiosity to most people. But by listing the real names of the officers, and going into much greater detail about them, it will soon become an instrument of war. It will be brutal, and it will offend and perhaps hurt many of them. I truly regret this because I also think most of them are decent people. But I must go through them in order to reach the top. That is the way the system is designed.
I truly regret the position that I am being forced into, but they have really left me no choice as far as I can see. All I have ever asked for here is honest communication with the police. Rusty York and his minions have made it very clear that they are either unable or unwilling to deliver on this simple and necessary request. My goal now is to show just how dysfunctional that department is. And to add credibility to my statements, I can no longer play around with the silly pseudonyms.
All I can say is that at least I will show the courage to make a formal declaration before I begin employing this new approach. I can only hope that somewhere among the people who run FWPD, at least one of them cares enough about their own officers to try and avert this. All it would take is a simple phone call or e-mail. But I think the reality of the situation has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that these people just don’t care. They don’t care about they citizens who are suffering from the crime which has been amplified by their own ineffective leadership. And they don’t care about their own officers, who are forced to suffer from the anger of citizens which is often caused by the department’s own disingenuous public proclamations.
Continued below...
Now, as far as the community is concerned, I certainly find a lot of truth in what you said. No one forces these guys to sell drugs in the first place, and their own families often enable them in their endeavors. But after living here for thirteen years, and getting to know many of my neighbors on a personal basis, I can also see the other side of the coin. I know that it is FWPD’s ineffective management of the situation here which has allowed the problem to flourish. And when something that lucrative is right outside your door, it is difficult for any young person to resist the temptation.
ReplyDeleteHell, one of my neighbors routinely shoots off his gun outside. I can tell you of more than a half dozen times in the past year that I have personally witnessed this. This person has been selling drugs here for years and has been the single greatest instigator of the violent activities here. And yet, this person appears to be enjoying some degree of protection from FWPD. He was the driver in a shooting last year, but the prosecutor decided to drop all charges in exchange for him testifying against his friend who actually did the shooting. It is also rumored by people here (including members of his own family) that he aided that same friend in committing one of the unsolved murders from last year. This person is a menace, and I believe that he is the creation of FWPD. When they deal with the situation in this manner, they send the wrong message to the kids who are watching what is going on. And that, most definitely, is also a big part of the problem.
As Far as the rules of engagement are concerned, that is the one area where I fundamentally disagree with you. Although weakening the rules would certainly allow for more aggressive action against the criminals, it would also open the door to the possibility of great abuses occurring. I don’t think it’s a trade worth making. I also don’t think it’s necessary, as there are so many legal methods they could be using to get better results. Honest dialogue with the citizens in high crime areas is one such method that comes to mind, but again, it has been shown that the brass are unwilling to engage in this.
I have put myself on the line many times in order to support the officers on the street here. If the police get a call of suspicious activity, they have to investigate. But because most of these calls are made anonymously, it gives the appearance that the police are just randomly harassing people for standing around. By coming outside and identifying myself, I take the pressure off the police. That guy now knows that it was me who complained, rather than just the police picking on him for no reason. That simple act transforms the police action from one that might be viewed as harassing one guy to one that can now be portrayed as helping another. When a pastor asks the police why they are constantly harassing his innocent young men, they can simply respond by saying perhaps he should ask the guy who claims to have repeatedly seen them selling drugs in his front yard!
I have done everything I possibly can here to work against the crime and to work with the police. And yet, I still get no return call when giving information about matters as serious as drug dealers buying guns on the street and people shooting at each other. Last summer, I overheard one of the guys here telling someone that he was going to kill someone. He made this threat moments after he had shot at someone else here. The person he mentioned in his threat ended up dead a few months later, shot while driving his car. I gave this information to the police, yet no one there called me back to ask any questions. How fucked up is that? They just do not want to be bothered with it. The response from FWPD to my vigilant actions proves that there is a complete lack of integrity among the people who run that department.