Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Turning To The Other Front: October 23, 2006

Looking back, I still can’t believe that after having so many people pissed off at me, things never did reach the point where I didn’t end up getting into a gun fight with someone. Maybe the guys here could read my face and realized I just didn’t give a damn. Maybe they actually were scared of me, or more likely they were just smart enough to realize that even if they won, the cost would be much higher than what it was worth. They had money to be made, and it was beginning to look like they had just factored me in as a cost of doing business.

If things had not calmed so quickly with the drug dealers, it is very likely that I would have taken no further action regarding Officer Marshall’s inappropriate behavior. Only a fool fights a two front war, and contending with either the dealers or the police alone would be enough to keep any person busy. But I had secured the Warsaw front (or so it seemed) by making a treaty with the dealers. Now it was time to turn my attention towards the gang on Creighton Street. My basic strategy here was to begin with the assumption that the attitude of Officer Marshall was not reflective of official FWPD policy

After making it through the weekend and becoming convinced that the signals being given to me by the dealers were sincere, I called FWPD and asked to speak with Chief York. His secretary said he was out of town that day and connected me to his voicemail. I left a brief message explaining my conversation with Officer Marshall and expressed that I felt his comments and attitude were inappropriate. I asked that Chief York listen to a recording of the conversation himself, then requested that I be allowed to meet with him in person to discuss the situation.

I had no idea if the conversation had even been recorded, but I began to worry that if it was, it might not be secure. I am certain Officer Marshall would not want anyone else to hear how he spoke to me. It was because of my concern over this, and the fact that I actually hadn’t been able to speak directly with Chief York, that I decided to call the FWPD front desk and inquire about how such a situation should be handled. I did not mention Officer Marshall by name, but did convey that he was a member of the Command Staff. The operator referred me to the internal affairs division of FWPD.

I called FWPD Internal Affairs Department next and spoke with Officer Calhoun, who asked if I wanted to file a formal complaint against Officer Marshall. I said no, adding that I simply wanted them to check and see if this conversation had been recorded. If it was I wanted them to turn it over to Chief York. Officer Calhoun responded “We can not even check to see if such a tape exists unless you file a formal complaint.” So, per direct orders of FWPD-IAD, I filed a complaint later that afternoon against one of their officers.

I did not have a printer on my home computer at the time, and I did not want to waste time in getting the form turned in, so I hand-wrote it. In hindsight, I realize that this was a mistake. First of all, I think FWPD is used to quickly brushing off complaints that come from people in the inner-city. They know that most of the time these people don’t have the financial resources to file a lawsuit, and that is really a person’s only recourse when the police department and their watchdogs refuse to act responsibly. I expect that my note being handwritten and a bit sloppy is in no small part what led them to summarily dismiss my complaint.

In spite of my failure to type, I think that I explained the situation adequately. I gave all the relevant information and stayed focused on the main point I was trying to get to, which was the problem with Officer Marshall. On the other hand, FWPD tried to confuse the issue by stating that I was just upset with the way their department handles things in this neighborhood. While that is certainly true, that is not what I stated in my complaint. As to the actual issue I did raise, they simply said that no recording of the conversation existed.

What they did not say was: How Officer Marshall characterized our conversation; whether calls to that number are usually recorded; if they even bothered to question Officer Marshall at all. Like I said before, it was simply a “fuck-off” letter.

And as for that part about FWPD striving to provide the best possible services, that makes about as much sense as when Councilman Pape publicly proclaimed that Harrison Square was one of the most open projects ever. I guess he just forgot about that time he told Councilman Schmidt to shut up and quit asking questions. And I guess FWPD just forgot about the fact that they appear to be running an open-air drug market from my front yard and that their associates just tried to burn down my house.

UPCOMING POSTS
Friday: Searching For Signs Of Intelligent Life
Monday: Taking Notes





12 comments:

  1. made a complaint back in 95 or so about a police officer down here in indianapolis. a couple years ago (or less) he got some type of award for being such a great cop. i got a similar letter that you got too. my conculsion to my story. well, if they like that cop then he will go far and more then likely internal affairs will do what they have to do to answer your question and to help him out. they are more worried about an issue once the media comes involved. then again that is an issue in itself.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SOunds like the typical "form letter"...
    But I find it weird that the letter states "MAY HAVE OCCURED"...!

    And you're right about most people not having the financial resources or being "lawyered-up" out the wazoo to pursue claims like this to their appropriate end.

    So people like us are left to do what, exactly?

    Seems to be a damned if you do, damned if you don't AKA a "no-win" scenario"...

    And "I don't like to lose".
    (didn't James Kirk also say that?)

    Stay Safe.

    B.G.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah, FWPD's Internal Affairs Department pretty much proved themselves worthless with that silly letter. And I expect that it is handled the same for most other police departments. Somehow, the idea of asking someone to investigate themselves for wrongdoing just seems like a bad idea to me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. lmao..............lol ya think?

    ReplyDelete
  5. its about service men and women being spied while talking on the phones back to the states. nsa was doing the spying and replaying some of the conversations for "parlor humer" for later. they had nsa investigate nsa and found out that no such thing existed. (whatever!!!). i found it funny too that i had a hard time finding it too. if you do go back to the indy channel it should be under national news. headline story. or it was at 4am.......

    ReplyDelete
  6. Indy:
    It would astound you to find out WHO is listening to who on the federal level.

    It might be the NSA, or the CIA, or the FBI, or the IRS...the list is endless (as are all the damn acronyms).

    ((But I never said that...and I was never here.))

    ReplyDelete
  7. well i got the fed job and i wont be too astounded. sometimes i walk by our security cameras at work and give them the bird.......i know i gotta quit that stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  8. you already know the answer.....if the face is covered or not........;)

    ReplyDelete
  9. dear phil, how r u?
    I am really missing u big man!!!
    missing ur nice emails :d:d
    hope ur relative is feeling better now.
    sorry for not writing to u all this time. I am a bit busy wid an exam. I'll write u soon dear

    take big care of urself

    ReplyDelete
  10. Zahra;

    I dropped you a note on your blog, and I will send you an e-mail soon.

    My step-father is doing a lot better, but has a long way to go yet. Thanks for your concern.

    Good luck on the exam!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Recovered Comment #5

    indy said...
    was reading this and thought of your little blog. thought you would enjoy we investigated whom. of course nothing like that ever happens....liers...and i know it.

    http://www.theindychannel.com/technology/17681737/detail.html

    October 9, 2008 10:20 PM



    Recovered Comment #6

    Phil Marx said...
    Indy;

    Every time that I put in that address, it actually takes me to "http://www.theindychannel.com/technology/17681737/detail/index.html" This seems to just be the home page for Channel 6 News, so I don't know what specific article you are talking about.

    October 9, 2008 11:34 PM

    ReplyDelete
  12. Recovered Comment #10

    Phil Marx said...
    I did see that story about spying on U.S. soldiers, but didn't read the whole thing.

    As to what the government listens to. Well, I doubt there is one "key" word that I haven't mentioned at least once in an e-mail to someone. I also have a pen-pal in Algeria that I frequently trade e-mails with. I also have had people from Indonesia, Malaysia and Haiti living at my house before, so there is no telling where my phone has connected to. Then there was that night (Sept 11, 2001) when I called the FBI to report information about some people I know. They said they'd get back with me but they never did, so I just walked into their F.W office one day and told the guy there what was on my mind. Then there was the time I walked into the F.W.-DEA office unannounced to tell them about the drug dealer who wanted to kill me. I even told them where he lived.

    By this point, I figure if I'm not on the governments "nuts to watch closely" list, then there is probably something very wrong.

    And Indy, I hope you are covering your face when you flip off your employer. Around here people seem to prefer smiling and acting silly for my cameras rather than flipping the bird.

    October 10, 2008 10:08 PM

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.